Torrent tracker - a community of users that allows them to share files using the Bitorrent protocol. The tool for this interaction was small programs - torrent clients. Today there are more than a dozen of them. But the three most famous among them are: MediaGet, uTorrent and Zona. In the article, we present their interfaces and functionality, and also try to give an answer to the question of which is better - uTorrent or Mediaget or Zona.
uTorrent: advantages and disadvantages
The first participant in the comparison of which is better - uTorrent or MediaGet will be a free basic (classic) version of uTorrent (Rus. "Mutorrent" or "Yutorrent"). He first saw the light in September 2005 as a beta with an index of 1.1. Over 13 years, it has been updated many times and its current version is 3.5.
The advantages of the program include the following nuances:
- Undemanding to resources.
It works on all versions of Windows: from 98 to 10. The main file on the hard drive is only 1-2 MB. During operation, the client takes 5-7 MB in RAM, depending on the intensity of work.
- Simple and intuitive interface.
It is very similar to the lightweight graphical shell of Windows XP. All buttons for downloading control (“start”, “pause”, “stop”) are located above the list of distributions. The settings menu is structured and allows you to quickly find the necessary option.
- Ability to create your own torrent files for file sharing.
This option is not so important for the average user, but necessary for those who create their own distributions on torrent trackers.
- The complete lack of advertising in versions 1.1-2.2.
- Localization.
The program has been translated into 2 dozen languages, including Russian.
- Bonus game in the window with information about the version of the program.
When you click on the English letter "T", a miniature tetris is launched.
The old versions have no flaws, but the versions 3.0 and higher have: advertising in the left and top of the window. There is a version of the classic uTorrent without ads, but it costs $ 5.
MediaGet: advantages and disadvantages
The second participant in the comparison of which is better - MediaGet or uTorrent will be MediaGet. It appeared in 2010, is completely free and is the main competitor to the paid uTorrent Pro, which costs $ 20 (1,250 rubles).
Consider its merits.
This function allows you to find movies, programs or music by torrent trackers that work without registration and rating system. You can also add services like rutracker.org to the list of trackers.
It allows you to watch videos and listen to music while it is downloading or after it has finished without the need to install third-party players.
It is as simple as in uTorrent - only the necessary buttons are displayed on the panel. The latter are very similar to the interface elements of Windows Vista or Seven. Settings are more meager and do not allow you to disrupt the program in a few clicks.
MediaGet has two drawbacks.
This is a consequence of the free program. You can disable it using third-party programs - AdMuncher or Adguard, for example.
- Black list of all antivirus programs.
Since its appearance on the Web, rumors have been circulating that this program is stealthily executing malicious code. Checks by Dr.Web and Kaspersky Lab experts proved the opposite, but considered the torrent client to be potentially dangerous software.
The Zona client is very similar in functionality to MediaGet and differs from it only in appearance.
So which is better: uTorrent or MediaGet?
If we compare the advantages of these programs, then MediaGet is more convenient for the user. After all, it can play audio and video files with the built-in player. UTorrent has a similar feature, but it uses Windows Media Player or another installed program. A full-fledged built-in player is available in the Utorrent Pro version.
There is no search for several trackers in uTorrent now, although in version 2.2.x there was a similar function. By this criterion, MediaGet is better. The interfaces of both programs are very different due to the functions embedded in them. But they are pleasant and understandable, which allows you to immediately understand them.
Based on the knowledge of the advantages and disadvantages of programs, it can be said that the MediaGet torrent processor is better suited for inexperienced users. The rest is recommended to use uTorrent in conjunction with full-fledged players.
Conclusion
It is difficult to give an unequivocal answer to the question of which is better - Torrent or MediaGet, since each user has his own preferences. The only solution to this problem is the alternate use of both programs with the subsequent selection of a favorite.