Choosing an engine for a future web project is quite difficult, since it is not at first glance that you can understand the significant differences between different options. It is difficult for a non-professional to immediately determine the functionality that cannot be implemented using one or another CMS. Relying on the opinions of someone from the outside is also not worth it, since in this case personal preferences most often play a role. So, some work exclusively with Joomla or Drupal, while others consider them to be “kindergarten”. In any case, if you need to determine the site engine, it is better to leave this choice to the specialist who will develop it.
«» , , . - CMS . , . , . , , .
, – . - . CMS , . - , . :
- . , . - .
- CMS. . .
- .
- .
- , . .
WordPress
, , . CMS WordPress, . - . .
, . WordPress , .
, WordPress . . CMS , -.
– - , , .
WordPress – .
Drupal
CMS, , . . , . , . Drupal , WordPress, , CMS. SEO- Drupal .
. - CMS , . .
Joomla
, , Joomla, eBay, Orange IKEA. , – . .
, . CMS . .
Bitrix
Bitrix . 1. , .
- Bitrix , . . . CMS .
, , . .
SEO- , , , , .
, , .
-? , - , . , - , , , .
, , :
- HTML- . content .
- .
- robots.txt. , .
- -.
- .
, , , .
CMS
, . . . URL 301. , « 404». , - .
The transfer process is no less laborious than the creation of a new platform. When performing this action, you need to be extremely careful to maintain positions in the results.